90 SCRIPTA MINOA
the form throws no obvious light on the name unless it be the triangular door
opening of a tent or wigwam.
'Gate' There seems some reason for believing, as was long ago pointed out by
Ilfand Lenormant, that he in the Phoenician series is a differentiated form of cMth? the
ch&h. 'fence' or 'enclosure'. It is, therefore, specially interesting to find in all the Minoan
scripts two closely parallel signs of very similar appearance, though used with
different values, which can be traced back step by step to a pictorial origin
evidently delineating a gate or hurdle. The Semitic he has only three bars,
but the Boeotian form of E (p)2 shows that the original Semitic prototype had
four bars, and strengthens the comparison with the Minoan forms. In the Cretan
hieroglyphic script this sign seems to have been used in the sense of 'custody'.
Thus we find it coupled with a pig. This sense of guardianship also comes out
under a more dignified aspect in formulas where it is associated with the sacred
Double Axe of the Minoan religion, in what may be an official title.
'Hand' Among the pairs of the Phoenician alphabet are yod (iota), meaning 'hand',
v<M?and coupled with kaph {kappa) = 'the hollow of the hand' or 'palm'. In the Minoan
kaph. series there are several hand and arm signs. Among the hieroglyphs appear either
two crossed arms or a single arm, and the hand seen either from the front or on
the side. There is also a primitive linear form apparently representing two arms
proceeding from a trunk with the hands in profile. In the linear series we find an
abbreviated form of this latter, giving a profile view of the hand and forearm, resembling
the Semitic yod. We also see, in addition to the ordinary ' hand' sign, another
type with the forearm and open hand completely linearized, the fingers being reduced
to three. This type precisely answers to the Semitic kaph (see Table VI).
The true connexion of the Phoenician names and letter-forms is here again
confirmed; but according to De Rouge" the yod is derived from a hieratic sign
representing ' parallels', and kaph from a handled ' bowl'!
■Fish/or The Hebrew nun means a 'fish', and the word in this sense is common to all
snake*5,1?— tne North Semitic languages. The resemblance to the object described is here
min. not obvious, though it has been suggested3 that this letter originated from the
abbreviated outline of a fish, taking the upper line of the head, the cross-line of the
gill, and the line of the belly. On the other hand, the Aethiopic name for this
letter, nahas = ' a serpent ',* suggests that its real origin may be sought in that
direction, and that the name 'fish' was rather applied to it from the association with
mem = 'water'. May it originally have depicted a water-snake or eel ? This suggestion
certainly receives a striking corroboration from the ascertained history of a similar
character in the Minoan script. A zigzag sign of the hieroglyphic class, No. 84 below,
1 Lenormant expressed the opinion that hi was a double Introduction to Greek Epigraphy, i. p. 312; and see W.Lar-
of chith {cf. De Roug£, Mtmoire sur torigine e'gyptienne ft\A,HandbuchdergriechischenEpigrapliih,i.gori,p^i,^o,^i).
de {alphabet phemcien, p. 7). s This suggestion was made by my father, Sir John
1 This form also reappears as a letter of the Phrygian Evans, Ioc. cit.
alphabet, perhaps in the wake of ' Aeolian' influences * Cf. J. P. Peters,' Recent Theories of the Origin of the
(Kirchhoff, Studien, &c., ed. iv. pp. 54 seqq. ; Roberts, Alphabet * (Journ. Am. Oriental Soc, vol. xxii. p. 195).
the form throws no obvious light on the name unless it be the triangular door
opening of a tent or wigwam.
'Gate' There seems some reason for believing, as was long ago pointed out by
Ilfand Lenormant, that he in the Phoenician series is a differentiated form of cMth? the
ch&h. 'fence' or 'enclosure'. It is, therefore, specially interesting to find in all the Minoan
scripts two closely parallel signs of very similar appearance, though used with
different values, which can be traced back step by step to a pictorial origin
evidently delineating a gate or hurdle. The Semitic he has only three bars,
but the Boeotian form of E (p)2 shows that the original Semitic prototype had
four bars, and strengthens the comparison with the Minoan forms. In the Cretan
hieroglyphic script this sign seems to have been used in the sense of 'custody'.
Thus we find it coupled with a pig. This sense of guardianship also comes out
under a more dignified aspect in formulas where it is associated with the sacred
Double Axe of the Minoan religion, in what may be an official title.
'Hand' Among the pairs of the Phoenician alphabet are yod (iota), meaning 'hand',
v<M?and coupled with kaph {kappa) = 'the hollow of the hand' or 'palm'. In the Minoan
kaph. series there are several hand and arm signs. Among the hieroglyphs appear either
two crossed arms or a single arm, and the hand seen either from the front or on
the side. There is also a primitive linear form apparently representing two arms
proceeding from a trunk with the hands in profile. In the linear series we find an
abbreviated form of this latter, giving a profile view of the hand and forearm, resembling
the Semitic yod. We also see, in addition to the ordinary ' hand' sign, another
type with the forearm and open hand completely linearized, the fingers being reduced
to three. This type precisely answers to the Semitic kaph (see Table VI).
The true connexion of the Phoenician names and letter-forms is here again
confirmed; but according to De Rouge" the yod is derived from a hieratic sign
representing ' parallels', and kaph from a handled ' bowl'!
■Fish/or The Hebrew nun means a 'fish', and the word in this sense is common to all
snake*5,1?— tne North Semitic languages. The resemblance to the object described is here
min. not obvious, though it has been suggested3 that this letter originated from the
abbreviated outline of a fish, taking the upper line of the head, the cross-line of the
gill, and the line of the belly. On the other hand, the Aethiopic name for this
letter, nahas = ' a serpent ',* suggests that its real origin may be sought in that
direction, and that the name 'fish' was rather applied to it from the association with
mem = 'water'. May it originally have depicted a water-snake or eel ? This suggestion
certainly receives a striking corroboration from the ascertained history of a similar
character in the Minoan script. A zigzag sign of the hieroglyphic class, No. 84 below,
1 Lenormant expressed the opinion that hi was a double Introduction to Greek Epigraphy, i. p. 312; and see W.Lar-
of chith {cf. De Roug£, Mtmoire sur torigine e'gyptienne ft\A,HandbuchdergriechischenEpigrapliih,i.gori,p^i,^o,^i).
de {alphabet phemcien, p. 7). s This suggestion was made by my father, Sir John
1 This form also reappears as a letter of the Phrygian Evans, Ioc. cit.
alphabet, perhaps in the wake of ' Aeolian' influences * Cf. J. P. Peters,' Recent Theories of the Origin of the
(Kirchhoff, Studien, &c., ed. iv. pp. 54 seqq. ; Roberts, Alphabet * (Journ. Am. Oriental Soc, vol. xxii. p. 195).