DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.22469#0152
Four
May 1, 10CO
Editor : * ' .
S. c.-jain \ fjimala^aivX:ni£5
UU. IS 26, Kal 1, I960
BORDER PROBLEM
The Joint Communi-
que on the. border talks
and Mr. Cbou Enlai's
■tatement in New Delhi
bare clearly indicated the
nature of border problems
between China and India.
The Chinese Premier re-
iterated that the McMahon
line waa unacceptable to
China.
The area of dispute
extends to the entire
length of India-China bor
der stretching from NEFA
to Ladakb As for us
the border dispute is con-
cerned, the problems con-
fronting the country are
Military, Administrative,
economic, and industrial
Sri Nehru in his speech
on the occasion of inau-
guration of the National
Defence College mentioned
about effective co-ordina-
tion between defenoo ser-
vices and other aspects
of the oountries economic,
industrial and administra
tive life including the
country's foreign policy.
The extention of the
administrative oontrol to
the remotest areas and
solution of the problems
of border people sre tatks
that should engage the
immediate attention of
the authorities
Letters te the Fditor
The Kdltnr I* not m|>ontibIe Tor view* Upres-
■eit in Mil* column E.i II. Time-
commonwealth citizen
Sir, i was separated
from my wife in Kajitn.
pong on 3-1.60 Shortly
afterwards, Kazini Brio
Ye Khangsarpa of Cha
khung (a British subject
like myself) was required
to leave her Kalimpong
home.
Both these expulsions
were ordered in invoking
the Foreigners' Act, 1940.
Yet one reads, for instance,
in Ainar Nandi, The Cons-
titution of •India, Calcutta.
7th edition, 1959, p 7?:"...
every country within the
Commonwealth is her< by
declared not to be Foreign
State for the purposes of
the Constitution". Why
then are British subjects
treated as Foreigners wi.
thin the Commonwealth ?
Are Indian nationals con-
sidered as Foreigners in
the United Kingdom ?
PerhapB some of your
readers could elucidate
these points which to me
at least, are not of purely
academic interest ? Yours
etc. A. W. MacJonald,
Manjula, Kalimpong
CLAIM ON EVEREST
GIVEN UP
Kathmandu, April 28
Mr Chou Kit lai has
given up his claim to
ills southern face of
EvereM, according to
reliable source*.
These sources said
the Chinese Pr.me Minister
told Mr B P. Koirala in
l'okbra ytsttrosy tl at he
was prepared to give up
his claim if Nepal accep-
ted that the boundary bet
ween Nepal nd China lay
across the crest ot Everest.
China it was poii ted
out, had not only claimed
Everest during last
mouth's Sino-Nepaleee
talks in Peking but alto
wanted a five-mile U ng
area below the southern
fsce of ICverest in Nepal.
Mr hoirala had told
the Chinese Premier that
not rnily the southern lace
of Everest but albo the
northern face up to the
12,000 toot bich Kougb-
buk gjacier • belonged to
Nepal.
The i.-*ue, which was.
taken up far discussion
at ■ Pokhra ^-between the
two Governments, is still
pending, these sources
added.
May 1, 10CO
Editor : * ' .
S. c.-jain \ fjimala^aivX:ni£5
UU. IS 26, Kal 1, I960
BORDER PROBLEM
The Joint Communi-
que on the. border talks
and Mr. Cbou Enlai's
■tatement in New Delhi
bare clearly indicated the
nature of border problems
between China and India.
The Chinese Premier re-
iterated that the McMahon
line waa unacceptable to
China.
The area of dispute
extends to the entire
length of India-China bor
der stretching from NEFA
to Ladakb As for us
the border dispute is con-
cerned, the problems con-
fronting the country are
Military, Administrative,
economic, and industrial
Sri Nehru in his speech
on the occasion of inau-
guration of the National
Defence College mentioned
about effective co-ordina-
tion between defenoo ser-
vices and other aspects
of the oountries economic,
industrial and administra
tive life including the
country's foreign policy.
The extention of the
administrative oontrol to
the remotest areas and
solution of the problems
of border people sre tatks
that should engage the
immediate attention of
the authorities
Letters te the Fditor
The Kdltnr I* not m|>ontibIe Tor view* Upres-
■eit in Mil* column E.i II. Time-
commonwealth citizen
Sir, i was separated
from my wife in Kajitn.
pong on 3-1.60 Shortly
afterwards, Kazini Brio
Ye Khangsarpa of Cha
khung (a British subject
like myself) was required
to leave her Kalimpong
home.
Both these expulsions
were ordered in invoking
the Foreigners' Act, 1940.
Yet one reads, for instance,
in Ainar Nandi, The Cons-
titution of •India, Calcutta.
7th edition, 1959, p 7?:"...
every country within the
Commonwealth is her< by
declared not to be Foreign
State for the purposes of
the Constitution". Why
then are British subjects
treated as Foreigners wi.
thin the Commonwealth ?
Are Indian nationals con-
sidered as Foreigners in
the United Kingdom ?
PerhapB some of your
readers could elucidate
these points which to me
at least, are not of purely
academic interest ? Yours
etc. A. W. MacJonald,
Manjula, Kalimpong
CLAIM ON EVEREST
GIVEN UP
Kathmandu, April 28
Mr Chou Kit lai has
given up his claim to
ills southern face of
EvereM, according to
reliable source*.
These sources said
the Chinese Pr.me Minister
told Mr B P. Koirala in
l'okbra ytsttrosy tl at he
was prepared to give up
his claim if Nepal accep-
ted that the boundary bet
ween Nepal nd China lay
across the crest ot Everest.
China it was poii ted
out, had not only claimed
Everest during last
mouth's Sino-Nepaleee
talks in Peking but alto
wanted a five-mile U ng
area below the southern
fsce of ICverest in Nepal.
Mr hoirala had told
the Chinese Premier that
not rnily the southern lace
of Everest but albo the
northern face up to the
12,000 toot bich Kougb-
buk gjacier • belonged to
Nepal.
The i.-*ue, which was.
taken up far discussion
at ■ Pokhra ^-between the
two Governments, is still
pending, these sources
added.