Newton, Charles T. [Hrsg.]; Pullan, Richard P. [Hrsg.]: A history of discoveries at Halicarnassus, Cnidus and Branchidae (Band 2, Teil 2) (London, 1863)

740 APPENDIX NO. III.

No. 88, Plate 10 (of this volume).

Aujia\TpL kcu Kovpa to ... .

ro IfiuTiov o air&AEOSV,
kol t'lica jj.lv anooo), EvlXa-
ra av-(o tl, a §£ kci pr) a7r[o]§([J,

avsvijicai avrb £7J"[i] Aa/xaTJjoa] koi (5)

ic[a]t Kovpav

7rE7rp)l/U£v[oc] KOL p. [)) T]li[^Oi £l/(X]aTti)[l'

"XP'e........

No. 89, Plate 10 (of this volume).

Kai tiKa rb ip\a\ri\ov o a7ra> [Aectev
aJTTOdM, ucria, tiKa 6e pi) cnroScjj, av\oma

Kai uvtm kol toTq avTo\y\ ir[ci<7i

koi avivtyiccu iwrpr)pivOQ

Itti Actparpa koi Kovpav ko.1 (5)

jut)] £vi[Xo.]tov avTae tv\oi.

Nos. 88, 89. These two fragments, written on
the opposite sides of the same tahlet, are identical
in import. In hoth an imprecation is invoked for
the non-restoration of a garment. The obscure
construction avsviyxai 7rc7rp7)[j.svos or Treirq^svov, 1. 5,
has been already noticed under No. 82, ante.

No. 88, 1. 6. This second xal seems superfluous.

1. 7. I read 7rs7rqrlfj.iv[og], but the last letter seems
like H.

No. 89, 1. 4k. I read irsTcgt\ii.£vog here.

If ireirg v)[x.ivog is right in No. 88, these two inscrip-
tions probably relate to the same person.