DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4679#0271
APPENDIX I.
INSCRIPTIONS OF LOUNDA, PELTAI, AND ATTANASSOS.
It is not easy to distinguish these from each other and from those of
Eumeneia. Transport is easy across the plain; and stones are often
taken on a waggon returning empty, if the owner is huilding or wants
a grave-stone. Lounda is at a greater distance, and doubt arises only in
one of its inscriptions; but Peltai, Attanassos, and Eumeneia are very
near each other. We shall class together under Eumeneia all the
sepulchral inscriptions, which have no interest except as presenting
general types; these three towns, being close together, agree in their
social and religious character. But a few which seem to have some
right to be classed to Peltai or to Attanassos will be given here. Those
found at Aidan or in the mosque being attributed to the latter, while
those found at Muglitch or west of it are attributed to Peltai. Those
found at Tchivril, Yakasomak, Omar-Keui, and similar places are un-
certain, and must be classed by internal analogy. But the number which
have any interest and repay classification is very small.
84. (R. 1887: Sterrett 1883 and Hogarth 1887). Isa-Bey. [Avto-
Kparopa Kaicrapa A. ~2]enTijiio[v 2eoi%>]oz> TlepTiva.K[a olvIktj^tov l Avyovar[ov
''Apa]f3LKov 'AbiafaiviKov [fj fijovXri kcu 6 brjp.[os 6 A]ovvbea>v. The date is
between 195 and 199. From this inscription we may restore the frag-
ment copied by Hamilton No. 348 77 j3o[v\rj k]ch 6 brjp.o]s 6 Aovvb]ia>v,
where Franz in CIGr 3902 u restores [TpaX]\emv, and Waddington Mel.
Nitmism. I p. 105 ^Tpya]\£<ov : in this half-obliterated text (of which
Hamilton could read only a few letters here and there), it is perfectly
allowable to treat A in the copy as A.
85. (R. 1887). Published by Hogarth2, No. 38. Near Seid. ol vioi
1 [M<?yi<T]roi' is also possible ; but I name immediately, while [avUrflros does
see no example where it follows the in CIG 1216, 1217. 2 See inscr. 37.
INSCRIPTIONS OF LOUNDA, PELTAI, AND ATTANASSOS.
It is not easy to distinguish these from each other and from those of
Eumeneia. Transport is easy across the plain; and stones are often
taken on a waggon returning empty, if the owner is huilding or wants
a grave-stone. Lounda is at a greater distance, and doubt arises only in
one of its inscriptions; but Peltai, Attanassos, and Eumeneia are very
near each other. We shall class together under Eumeneia all the
sepulchral inscriptions, which have no interest except as presenting
general types; these three towns, being close together, agree in their
social and religious character. But a few which seem to have some
right to be classed to Peltai or to Attanassos will be given here. Those
found at Aidan or in the mosque being attributed to the latter, while
those found at Muglitch or west of it are attributed to Peltai. Those
found at Tchivril, Yakasomak, Omar-Keui, and similar places are un-
certain, and must be classed by internal analogy. But the number which
have any interest and repay classification is very small.
84. (R. 1887: Sterrett 1883 and Hogarth 1887). Isa-Bey. [Avto-
Kparopa Kaicrapa A. ~2]enTijiio[v 2eoi%>]oz> TlepTiva.K[a olvIktj^tov l Avyovar[ov
''Apa]f3LKov 'AbiafaiviKov [fj fijovXri kcu 6 brjp.[os 6 A]ovvbea>v. The date is
between 195 and 199. From this inscription we may restore the frag-
ment copied by Hamilton No. 348 77 j3o[v\rj k]ch 6 brjp.o]s 6 Aovvb]ia>v,
where Franz in CIGr 3902 u restores [TpaX]\emv, and Waddington Mel.
Nitmism. I p. 105 ^Tpya]\£<ov : in this half-obliterated text (of which
Hamilton could read only a few letters here and there), it is perfectly
allowable to treat A in the copy as A.
85. (R. 1887). Published by Hogarth2, No. 38. Near Seid. ol vioi
1 [M<?yi<T]roi' is also possible ; but I name immediately, while [avUrflros does
see no example where it follows the in CIG 1216, 1217. 2 See inscr. 37.