DOI Heft:
No. 223 (October 1911)
DOI Artikel:On some designs for seaside bungalows
DOI Seite / Zitierlink: https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.21155#0068
Designs for Seaside Bungalows
" Revil's " is a good plan,
without, however, a pro-
jecting porch to the hall,
and we congratulate the
servants on having the
biggest bedroom in the
house. He gives, by the
way, no cubical area and
no price.
The windows in " Crop's "
living-room—thanks to his
deep verandah—might well
have two additional lights.
His estimate of cost is only
^851. Had he gone to the full extent of the limit
allowed, i.e. ^£1200, he could have avoided such
a flaw as bedrooms only 9 ft. 9 in. by 7 ft. 9 in.
and 11 ft. by 7 ft. 6 in.
" Thatch " has hit upon the pleasant device of
a central open court round which his rooms are
design for seaside bungalow
the building could not be carried out for 5^. a
foot.
" Brutus " sends a V-plan, the point of which is
widened out to obtain a living-room with dining-
recess and book-room at either end—quite a good
arrangement. We also note that he provides a
billiard-room over the living-room, though, if he
works this cut, he will find that its size is but 16 ft.
by 12 ft. 6 in.
"Maiwonde" sends a nice sheet of drawings.
The plan c onsists of a central
hall with a dining-room and
offices on one side, and the
three family bedrocms on
the other.
Both " S tr aight-Away '
and "Dhu-Craig" (p. 47)
send strong and vigorous
drawings, but the section of
the former does not agree
with his plan. It is a good,
quiet elevation, and the meal-
room — an annexe to the
family room—w ould be a
pleasant feature. " Dhu-
Craig's" motor-house is only
7 ft. 6 in. wide. design for seaside bungalow
J5ccile of Feet
" Revil's " is a good plan,
without, however, a pro-
jecting porch to the hall,
and we congratulate the
servants on having the
biggest bedroom in the
house. He gives, by the
way, no cubical area and
no price.
The windows in " Crop's "
living-room—thanks to his
deep verandah—might well
have two additional lights.
His estimate of cost is only
^851. Had he gone to the full extent of the limit
allowed, i.e. ^£1200, he could have avoided such
a flaw as bedrooms only 9 ft. 9 in. by 7 ft. 9 in.
and 11 ft. by 7 ft. 6 in.
" Thatch " has hit upon the pleasant device of
a central open court round which his rooms are
design for seaside bungalow
the building could not be carried out for 5^. a
foot.
" Brutus " sends a V-plan, the point of which is
widened out to obtain a living-room with dining-
recess and book-room at either end—quite a good
arrangement. We also note that he provides a
billiard-room over the living-room, though, if he
works this cut, he will find that its size is but 16 ft.
by 12 ft. 6 in.
"Maiwonde" sends a nice sheet of drawings.
The plan c onsists of a central
hall with a dining-room and
offices on one side, and the
three family bedrocms on
the other.
Both " S tr aight-Away '
and "Dhu-Craig" (p. 47)
send strong and vigorous
drawings, but the section of
the former does not agree
with his plan. It is a good,
quiet elevation, and the meal-
room — an annexe to the
family room—w ould be a
pleasant feature. " Dhu-
Craig's" motor-house is only
7 ft. 6 in. wide. design for seaside bungalow
J5ccile of Feet