PLA TE CXX1X. CONTINUED.
i. ne. a. te. ro. wo. o. . . .
2. ka. to. ti. (or si?) o. - ?. . . .
3. to. i. pa. -?-?.. .
Too fragmentary to attempt reading throughout. In the second line ™ 5i<S[i] seems recognizable ;
and in the third line ™ nao-eo^vt] has been suggested, as an equivalent of Kxr;Vio; as an epithet of
Zeus. The inscription is evidently dedicatory or votive; and while conjectures may be made for
the other portions, nothing certain can be arrived at.
Published from the original by Hall, ubi supra, X, p. 206, PI. I, No. 4; XI, p. 218; Ces-
nola, Cyprus, Plate 4, No. 16.
i. ne. a. te. ro. wo. o. . . .
2. ka. to. ti. (or si?) o. - ?. . . .
3. to. i. pa. -?-?.. .
Too fragmentary to attempt reading throughout. In the second line ™ 5i<S[i] seems recognizable ;
and in the third line ™ nao-eo^vt] has been suggested, as an equivalent of Kxr;Vio; as an epithet of
Zeus. The inscription is evidently dedicatory or votive; and while conjectures may be made for
the other portions, nothing certain can be arrived at.
Published from the original by Hall, ubi supra, X, p. 206, PI. I, No. 4; XI, p. 218; Ces-
nola, Cyprus, Plate 4, No. 16.