HOUSE OF FRESCOES': PAINTED PLASTER STACK 445
plaster had been laid directly on a clay surface. A few fragments were no more
than 3 mm. thick. The mean width of the pieces as squared was, so far as
could be calculated, about 23 cm. (c. 9 in.). Had they been simply flung down,
such delicate slips
would have been
pulverized. It is
therefore evident
that the pieces must
have been carefully
removed, and piled
in layers on the
heap, with the face
upwards or down-
wards, indifferently.
A regular stack was
thus formed, about
3-65 metres long
(N. to S.) and 1 -50
metres broad, slop-
ing up towards the
North, in which at
one place I counted
thirty-four distinct
layers. Some of
the fragments ex-
tended over the
stump of the wall
to the South, but
this was probably
due to the falling
forward of the heap
piled against it on
that side, when the upper part of the rubble masonry had fallen away.
The removal of this mass of painted fragments was a long and arduous Removal
work, the separate pieces, often cracked into many smaller bits, being in ments.
each case first covered over by damp paper, on which a coating of plaster of
Paris was then spread. The support afforded by this hard backing made it
then possible to lift the pieces, whether the painted face lay upwards or
downwards. Eighty-four trays (2x2 ft.) were finally filled with the frag-
Fig. 261.
Stack of Painted Plaster Fragments :
Frescoes '.
House of
plaster had been laid directly on a clay surface. A few fragments were no more
than 3 mm. thick. The mean width of the pieces as squared was, so far as
could be calculated, about 23 cm. (c. 9 in.). Had they been simply flung down,
such delicate slips
would have been
pulverized. It is
therefore evident
that the pieces must
have been carefully
removed, and piled
in layers on the
heap, with the face
upwards or down-
wards, indifferently.
A regular stack was
thus formed, about
3-65 metres long
(N. to S.) and 1 -50
metres broad, slop-
ing up towards the
North, in which at
one place I counted
thirty-four distinct
layers. Some of
the fragments ex-
tended over the
stump of the wall
to the South, but
this was probably
due to the falling
forward of the heap
piled against it on
that side, when the upper part of the rubble masonry had fallen away.
The removal of this mass of painted fragments was a long and arduous Removal
work, the separate pieces, often cracked into many smaller bits, being in ments.
each case first covered over by damp paper, on which a coating of plaster of
Paris was then spread. The support afforded by this hard backing made it
then possible to lift the pieces, whether the painted face lay upwards or
downwards. Eighty-four trays (2x2 ft.) were finally filled with the frag-
Fig. 261.
Stack of Painted Plaster Fragments :
Frescoes '.
House of