DOI article:
Milošević, Gordana: Principia and Praetoria along the Roman Limes in the Lower Danube
DOI Page / Citation link: https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.41866#0064
62
2
Ο__ίο_20 Ill
Fig. 14. Praetoria: 1. Drobeta (Tumu Severin);
2. Pontes (Kostol)
Internal organization and structures within smaller Late Roman fortifications
are even less known. It is certain that large principia buildings with courtyard
had not been suitable for fortifications covering areas from 0.5 to 1.00 ha and
with garrison of about 100 soldiers [Petrovic 1986, 94], In order to be of better
use the interior area had been reorganized and some of the buildings acquired
multilateral purpose. Same situation is encountered in the described structure in
the fortification Campsa (Ravna). Rationalization of space in the Late Roman
period is noticeable in the fortifications of quadriburgium type with internal tower
(Mihajlovac — Blato, Mihajlovac — Mora Vagei, Bordej, Glamija, Hajducka
Vodenica), where storeys of the internal building acquired different functions
2
Ο__ίο_20 Ill
Fig. 14. Praetoria: 1. Drobeta (Tumu Severin);
2. Pontes (Kostol)
Internal organization and structures within smaller Late Roman fortifications
are even less known. It is certain that large principia buildings with courtyard
had not been suitable for fortifications covering areas from 0.5 to 1.00 ha and
with garrison of about 100 soldiers [Petrovic 1986, 94], In order to be of better
use the interior area had been reorganized and some of the buildings acquired
multilateral purpose. Same situation is encountered in the described structure in
the fortification Campsa (Ravna). Rationalization of space in the Late Roman
period is noticeable in the fortifications of quadriburgium type with internal tower
(Mihajlovac — Blato, Mihajlovac — Mora Vagei, Bordej, Glamija, Hajducka
Vodenica), where storeys of the internal building acquired different functions