DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.3044#0239
224 CHAPTER 7
42 M.A.V. Gill, BSA 60 (1965) 66.
43 SM I 19-20.
44 PM I 271-276. Matz's statement that the exact dating of the Deposit is unimportant (CAH II Part 1, 158)
is only valid if one is not interested in characterizing the material chronologically.
45 Boardman, GGFR 34; Biesantz, SiegelbUder 125-126; Reich, AJA 74 (1970) 406-408; Pelon, BCH 89
(1956) 9.
46 Motifs 2:29, 30; 6:2; 13:7; 55:3.
47 PM I 272 n. 2. For seals belonging to this group cf. PM I 275 fig. 204; 277 fig. 207.
48 SM I 30.
49 AJA 74 (1970) 406-408.
50 From Phaistos: Motifs 8:1; 11:9; 44:8. Impressions of the Hieroglyphic Deposit Group have come to light
in the MM II Quartier Mu in Malia (Etcret 23 11978] pi. 13-14). The attribution of CMS 115 204 (44:8) is
clearer when it is compared to CM 160 (44:7), a Foliate Back in hard stone. Cf. also CM 117 (44:6), said
to come from a MM II context in Knossos.
51 Gill, BSA 60 (1965) 66.
52 Cf. Motifs 2:39; 7:15, 19; 11:17; 17:9, from Phaistos.
53 Supra 17, on the dating of this deposit.
54 Personal communication with Sinclair Hood 16.IV.79.
55 AJA 74 (1970) 407 n. 15.
56 PM II 580-581; III 246-247, 249-250; IV 50-54.
57 Cf. D. Levi, BdA 41 (1956) 263 fig. 46b and Levi, The Recent Excavations at Phaistos, SIMA 11 (1964) 9
fig. 34 with SM I pi. VII.
58 AJA 74 (1970) 406.
59 Warren, BSA 62 (1967) 200 n. 35; Walberg, Kamares 121-122.
60 BCH 89 (1956) 1.
61 Stone Vases 11, 41.
62 Hogarth, JHS 22 (1902) pi. 120; Betts, Kadmos 6 (1967) 27-28 for the dating. Reich's identification of
this context as "Late Mycenaean" arises from directly citing the terminology current in 1902; Cf. Hogarth,
JHS 22 (1902) 333.
63 Levi, ASAtene 8-9 (1925-26) 86 type 2 fig. 29.
64 Kadmos 17 (1978) opposite p. 4 pi. I fig. 2=AM 1938.1153b.
65 Etcret 2 (1930) 6 pis. 1-6.
66 Supra 171.
42 M.A.V. Gill, BSA 60 (1965) 66.
43 SM I 19-20.
44 PM I 271-276. Matz's statement that the exact dating of the Deposit is unimportant (CAH II Part 1, 158)
is only valid if one is not interested in characterizing the material chronologically.
45 Boardman, GGFR 34; Biesantz, SiegelbUder 125-126; Reich, AJA 74 (1970) 406-408; Pelon, BCH 89
(1956) 9.
46 Motifs 2:29, 30; 6:2; 13:7; 55:3.
47 PM I 272 n. 2. For seals belonging to this group cf. PM I 275 fig. 204; 277 fig. 207.
48 SM I 30.
49 AJA 74 (1970) 406-408.
50 From Phaistos: Motifs 8:1; 11:9; 44:8. Impressions of the Hieroglyphic Deposit Group have come to light
in the MM II Quartier Mu in Malia (Etcret 23 11978] pi. 13-14). The attribution of CMS 115 204 (44:8) is
clearer when it is compared to CM 160 (44:7), a Foliate Back in hard stone. Cf. also CM 117 (44:6), said
to come from a MM II context in Knossos.
51 Gill, BSA 60 (1965) 66.
52 Cf. Motifs 2:39; 7:15, 19; 11:17; 17:9, from Phaistos.
53 Supra 17, on the dating of this deposit.
54 Personal communication with Sinclair Hood 16.IV.79.
55 AJA 74 (1970) 407 n. 15.
56 PM II 580-581; III 246-247, 249-250; IV 50-54.
57 Cf. D. Levi, BdA 41 (1956) 263 fig. 46b and Levi, The Recent Excavations at Phaistos, SIMA 11 (1964) 9
fig. 34 with SM I pi. VII.
58 AJA 74 (1970) 406.
59 Warren, BSA 62 (1967) 200 n. 35; Walberg, Kamares 121-122.
60 BCH 89 (1956) 1.
61 Stone Vases 11, 41.
62 Hogarth, JHS 22 (1902) pi. 120; Betts, Kadmos 6 (1967) 27-28 for the dating. Reich's identification of
this context as "Late Mycenaean" arises from directly citing the terminology current in 1902; Cf. Hogarth,
JHS 22 (1902) 333.
63 Levi, ASAtene 8-9 (1925-26) 86 type 2 fig. 29.
64 Kadmos 17 (1978) opposite p. 4 pi. I fig. 2=AM 1938.1153b.
65 Etcret 2 (1930) 6 pis. 1-6.
66 Supra 171.