DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.22468#0317
iimalapan Cimssr
A NEWS WEEKLY PUBUSHED EVERY
VOL. XIII AUGUST 16, 1959. " ■/tiGpQ
CHINESE FORCES ALL OVER TIBET ^SJffi^fiS
attributed to tho Chinese
INDIANS CALLED "IMPERIALISTS" Mission's chiof. Bince hp
had no reliable inform-
Non Delhi, August 13 tion on the point, it was
difficult for him to com-'
Mr Nehru disclosed thai India's iotf grity must mem.
in the Lck Sal.U today be safeguarded at al'l coats. When a member asked
that in her (nt Note to When a PSP member, him whether there were
Peking, sent as recently Mr H,m Bsrua. raised 20 Chinese divisions sta-
ts on July 23 India bad the quMtj0D „f the Mae tioned in Tibet Mi. Nehru
protested against luuiaus Mahon i.ine, the Prima said he oould not Bay
bemg desoribed as "im-, Minister stated oategori- anytbing'now but promis-
perialiste' in ofhoial Chi- 3,I|j that at no time had ed to place befcre the
nese propaganda. they received any oom- House any reliable iufor
The Prime Minister's munioaUion from the Chi- matron that might be
remarks were in reference n«°. Government ques- available later,
to some adjournment tioning the validity of the *r. R. P. Sinha aek-
motions reflecting ojem- MaoMalion Line. ed whether any restric
bers' grave concern ovtr As far as India was turns were being placed
i>>.- rt* that a Isrgn cuncemed, Mr Nehru on the other Indian na
Chinvae fotoo was con. stated, tho MacMabon tionala going to the Mis-
cntrated on the Silt kirn- Line wa- tne firm lire 'by lion in Lhasa,
and P>hutan borders and treaty, usage and geogra Mr. Nehru said that
thst Tibetans wer« being pliy/ h» did not think there
exhorted to "liberate ' I,a. As regards the report were any rules prohibit-',
dnkb, Bhutan, Sikkim & that people in Tibet were ing ?ueh visits, but the
the NE.F A.-.. being exhorted to "Jib*. fact was that it was dif-
Mr. Nehru said theia rate" the adjoining areas ficnlt to travel and all
were large Chinese forces a newspaper despatch on kinds of permits were re-
all over the'ibet baths the subject qnot«d a quired, there ware no
did not think they were speech by the head of conveyances available or
niassorf am the borders the Chinese Missicn in the roads might not be
He .ssnred the Hours 'I ibet. He had no in open to traffic and so or.
•that, "we are wide awake fcrmati«n from "reliable It was not easy for p«o
»nd alert ' and he «frre( d sources^ in regard to the> pie to go from one town
i^witb members' sentiment speech but it would be to another.
^Jp»»ssaaa»»a«tss»af^Hfrl»«j; '
^Annual Rs. 6/- Per Copy 13 nP
✓sr.1
A NEWS WEEKLY PUBUSHED EVERY
VOL. XIII AUGUST 16, 1959. " ■/tiGpQ
CHINESE FORCES ALL OVER TIBET ^SJffi^fiS
attributed to tho Chinese
INDIANS CALLED "IMPERIALISTS" Mission's chiof. Bince hp
had no reliable inform-
Non Delhi, August 13 tion on the point, it was
difficult for him to com-'
Mr Nehru disclosed thai India's iotf grity must mem.
in the Lck Sal.U today be safeguarded at al'l coats. When a member asked
that in her (nt Note to When a PSP member, him whether there were
Peking, sent as recently Mr H,m Bsrua. raised 20 Chinese divisions sta-
ts on July 23 India bad the quMtj0D „f the Mae tioned in Tibet Mi. Nehru
protested against luuiaus Mahon i.ine, the Prima said he oould not Bay
bemg desoribed as "im-, Minister stated oategori- anytbing'now but promis-
perialiste' in ofhoial Chi- 3,I|j that at no time had ed to place befcre the
nese propaganda. they received any oom- House any reliable iufor
The Prime Minister's munioaUion from the Chi- matron that might be
remarks were in reference n«°. Government ques- available later,
to some adjournment tioning the validity of the *r. R. P. Sinha aek-
motions reflecting ojem- MaoMalion Line. ed whether any restric
bers' grave concern ovtr As far as India was turns were being placed
i>>.- rt* that a Isrgn cuncemed, Mr Nehru on the other Indian na
Chinvae fotoo was con. stated, tho MacMabon tionala going to the Mis-
cntrated on the Silt kirn- Line wa- tne firm lire 'by lion in Lhasa,
and P>hutan borders and treaty, usage and geogra Mr. Nehru said that
thst Tibetans wer« being pliy/ h» did not think there
exhorted to "liberate ' I,a. As regards the report were any rules prohibit-',
dnkb, Bhutan, Sikkim & that people in Tibet were ing ?ueh visits, but the
the NE.F A.-.. being exhorted to "Jib*. fact was that it was dif-
Mr. Nehru said theia rate" the adjoining areas ficnlt to travel and all
were large Chinese forces a newspaper despatch on kinds of permits were re-
all over the'ibet baths the subject qnot«d a quired, there ware no
did not think they were speech by the head of conveyances available or
niassorf am the borders the Chinese Missicn in the roads might not be
He .ssnred the Hours 'I ibet. He had no in open to traffic and so or.
•that, "we are wide awake fcrmati«n from "reliable It was not easy for p«o
»nd alert ' and he «frre( d sources^ in regard to the> pie to go from one town
i^witb members' sentiment speech but it would be to another.
^Jp»»ssaaa»»a«tss»af^Hfrl»«j; '
^Annual Rs. 6/- Per Copy 13 nP
✓sr.1