Ars: časopis Ústavu Dejín Umenia Slovenskej Akadémie Vied (44.2011)

.9. P7<?r
P/9^ j9r y^r7V ^c%P%g
A'Von'r o/
7772 - 7773, P.
R?07M7*d7, ^X*<9^C^7nt
M W of
/^o^V7r<?/^ Lliz P. VÍpV
bwA Rrpw.' P<?/og^ď.'
po-á/Lz ř /^ř7(?ň7í?79g7ď <3V
fřrt^ro %ř7 ytcrzA.
EZ. P. L. CERLEL-
EdPÍ-R bC4NPM-
IW7. P^bgM 7773
^v.;.

sures gravitating as much on the laistorical fabric as
on the new areas of expansion. However, for Roberto
Pane, this denouncement in no way coincides with the
en bloc condemnation of contemporary architecture,
nor with its plausibility in the historical fabric. in fact,
he had supported, together with Ernesto Nathan
Rogers and Bruno Zevi, the project of Frank Lloyd
Wright for the Masieri Foundation in Venice! What is
more, füll récognition of the incrémental potential, so
to speak, of contemporary architecture and the need
for its intégration with the historical patrimony gave
rise to his contribution towards the définition of the

"additive principle" that took shape in the Charter
of Venice of 1965 and which conňrms a duál need
for the project of restoration: on one hand, not to
remove anything from the stratification that has been
passed on to us and as it has been passed on to us; on
the other hand of the absolute recognizability, inso-
far as it is not self-rcferential, of the contemporary
character of the necessary integrative worksV

^ See SCARROCCHIA, S.: La ncezione di Riegl m Italia dalla
Carte di Venezia ad oggi. In: Pl/Vt R?<g/ C&V? — 7703))
jwo/<9 (=Atti dei Convegni Lincei, 236). Roma 2008, pp.

62