Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Overview
loading ...
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
OCR fulltext
1070

Appendix J

20, 306 f.). Hieraus ging einerseits durch Anlehnung an Uo\v-(ppdcrp.a>v u. a.
(§ 88 Anm. 2) die Form 'Ayapeo-pcov hervor ; 'Ayapepvcov anderseits zeigt die
gleiche Behandlung des 8p wie att. peo-6-pvrj neben ion. peo-6-8prf (§ 58), vpvos
aus *v8pos (falls zu v8a>, v8eco, s. W. Schmid, Rhein. Mus. 61, 480; anders,
aber unwahrscheinlich Ehrlich, Rhein. Mus. 62, 321 ff., vgl. ferner P. Maas,
Philol. 66, 590 ff.), kret. pvcoa neben ion. 8pdos: in einzelnen griechischen Dialek-
ten wurde also 8p zu vp (vgl. wn aus gm § 87, 6) und dieses weiter zu pv (vgl.
neuir. meamna = altir. menme 'mens') zu einer Zeit, wo der Wandel von uridg.
-11m- zu -fxfx- schon langst vollzogen war1, ^Dass dm- schon uridg. zu nm-
geworden sei und hierauf unser p.v beruhe (so zuletzt johansson, IF. 3, 227), ist
unwahrscheinlich.) Aus diesem Dialektgebiet stammt die Form 'Aya-pipvmv.
Anders Kretschmer a. a. O., Fick, Gott. gel. Anz. 1894 S. 234. 241 (der in
peo-6-pvr] urspriingliches -8p,v- vermutet) und Schulze, Gott. gel. Anz. 1896
S. 236 (der in fj.ea6fj.pr], 'Ayapepvav " durch eine Art von Metathesis 8p zu fiv
und weiter zu fiv" geworden sein lasst unter Mitwirkung des in den beiden
Wdrtern vorausgehenden p) ; vgl. aber auch Stolz, Innsbrucker Festschr.
zur 50. Philol.-Vers. (1909) 13 ff.' Farnell Cults of Gk. States iv. 50 without
venturing upon philological ground assumes that 'the two names [Zeus and
'Aya/xepvav] were originally quite distinct and became conjoined owing to some
later fusion of cults.' But A. Furtwangler in Roscher Lex. Myth. i. 96 ' ein
chthonischer Zeus' and K. Wernicke in Pauly—Wissowa Real. E?ic. i. 721
'vielleicht ein chthonischer Gott' had already pointed the way to a better
solution of the problem. In the Class. Rev. 1903 xvii. 277, cp. Folk-Lore 1904
xv. 299, 301, I contended that the hero was a Zeus all along, the local champion
or king being as such the embodiment of the god. Even in Homer there are
traces of this belief. Agamemnon's stock epithet ava% dv8pcbv is suggestive of a
divine appellation (cp. Verg. Aen. 1. 65 divom pater atque hominum rex, Hes.
theog. 923 8eav fiacn\rjL «at dvbpav), and in II. 2 478 he is described as 'dp.fj.aTa
<a\ k.e(pa\r)v (S. A. Naber cj. <fi8oyyr)v) 'lueXos Ail repiriKepavva. See further supra

p. 1060 f.

APPENDIX J.

ZEUS amphiAraos.

The worship of Zeus 'Apcptdpaos at Oropos is attested by Dikaiarch. 1. 6
(Geogr. Gr. min. i. ioo Miiller) evrevdev els 'Q.pa>Trbv 8t 'A(pi8va>v Kal roil 'Ap(pL-
apdov a109 lepov 686v eXevdepco f3a8i£ovTl (T^eSof rfpepas Trpoo-dvrrj navra. The
text is not free from corruption. For the manuscript's 8La8aq)vL8bv L. Holstein
and others read 8id AeXcplviov (cp. Strab. 403), C. Miiller in Frag. hist. Gr. ii.
256 8Ca ^a(pi8a)v (cp. Strab. 399); id. in Geogr. Gr. min. i. 100 accepts C. Words-
worth's cj. St' ,A(pi8vSjv or else 81 'A(pl8va>v. For the manuscript's 68ov...irp6o-avTa
C. Miiller, after I. Casaubon, proposes 686s...Trpoo-dvrrjs ndo-a, but prints 686v...
■npoo-dvTrf [iravra]. Casaubon wanted to expunge Atos. But he was certainly
wrong. The hero Amphiaraos had come to be reckoned as a god: cp. Soph.
El. 836 ff. ot'Sa yap avaur 'Aprptdpeaiv ^pvcroSeTois | epnea-i KpvCpdevra yvvamcbv
Kcti vvv vtto yalas \ | Trdp-^svxos dvdo-o-ei with Cic. de div. i. 88 Amphiaraum
autem sic honoravit fama Graeciae, deus ut haberetur, atque ut ab eius solo,
in quo est humatus, oracula peterentur, Paus. 1. 34. 2 debv 8e 'Apcpidpaov Trparois
'i2pco7Tiot? KareaTT] vopi^eiv, varepov 8e <a\ ot navres "~EWrfves {jyrjvrai. That he was
 
Annotationen