DOI Heft:
Artykuły / Artikel / Articles
DOI Artikel:Girsztowt, Aleksandra: The book collection of the Loitz family in the Elbląg library: current state of research, overview of the collection, and a supplement to the list of prints
DOI Seite / Zitierlink:https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.66965#0290
Aleksandra
Girsztowt
föfij^retfineipfius notin',·ν (ieq; alicm'nscoplezionefiirisnouttnec
fielt ordinäre regimen ,ρριαϊί fanitati conferuande neip morbos corpis
nordtnieceanicuranecdeeis fiufficit fecure,pnöfticare.Prcrerea huius V
ftcundi inftrumenti cutatiois fcićtia canto nobis plus neceflaria & vti
lis eft: quanto nos magis etiä fpeculo in morborum cognitionetn duck
8Lyiderefacitintimius. Eaeniquenobisderaorbotu cognitive ezte
rtus appatuerüt in fpeculo-.ülaiam intus vidcre poflumus p clauć apee
cisportispolfuü:&eomagiscumfitpulfusde apparcntibus cum eeri
tudinequeeftfebrisindicanseffenriä eiiis.f.frequenria HC velociras ex
parte fonneiquod non fiat yrina.-qtie cum fit viriabilisiquii yno die
Tnigiscoloraaeitgindiealioidćideonóefaegrinidinis fignu Ipecifi
cumxum nullum fignii fpecificu fit variabile. Vndeffialienus. qm co ‘ -dp P
gnolcitegritudinempvTmäxognoicit fiaiincäperfiaitn.Ergo pnui ' ‘
preceffitcognicio hcus qm hculncc:ergon-ius cognicio eifpefpoitaio
ra.-<Sć perconfequeus nullius egritudiins feu febrS demoii(trat>ua;qui»
vnnanon l>ip>hutmorbos kd n .m nl d ,
ybi pui/usindicatenentiam eius.vt lupra dictum efLquarcaddit Gali
enus icerii dicens.quineßjtdj(Hngucre fpccies egritudinń fimpliciuuj
purarń.-ytpute tebriö mtcrpollacart per pidfum non eil diguus flarę ii
P»
foi LXXXV1
Seconda epiphaniamedicorixm de pulfibus*
modo yna epipha
^■fniarii medicorü illuttrantium fpeculo
videndi yrinas hominii: tanqna
J^jgMjprimo inftrumenro cognitiöis atq; cn
raaó,Y7rborf· efficaaffimo.ÄE
| H nunc de fccutrdaaduc plus ilJuflränte /
' ·';k· 'koki k^nnaniarpuracJaucapcnćdj porks " ' , ' ;
' k." W P'rlimcmi fdentiain morborü co
. » gnitione: yel etiain curarione nobis
yalde necefiaria eft 8C ytilis: yt diat
li^K dc gordoip .* njo
^gjgj^^^^^^^gl'iliarchainedicine exceflcntiifimus.-qd
M^M^^pprobansJąggbus departibus in de
f/d]!^damatioibvß famine brie, fan fcäe
7 prnm vbi d)cit:<j,nqticia pulfuüyal <
-— de neceil»ifift medicomuia nil S1S·'
Fig. 6. Ulrich Pinder, Epiphanie medicorum, 1506, library of Simon Loitz in the
Elbląg Library, photo: Elbląg Library
bookplates, but there are characteristic numbers on the title pages which also
feature on copies with proprietary marks, and furthermore, these titles do not
appear in the inventory, which would support the theory that they belonged
to Heinrich Loitz. In some cases, the signature has been damaged, and this char-
acteristic number is the indication that the work comes from the Loitz collec-
tion. And so, thanks to the comparison with the preserved inventory from 1624,
we could very likely add to the list of works forming part of the legacy works
by Bartholomeus Kechermann, among others. On this basis, we can estimate
288
Girsztowt
föfij^retfineipfius notin',·ν (ieq; alicm'nscoplezionefiirisnouttnec
fielt ordinäre regimen ,ρριαϊί fanitati conferuande neip morbos corpis
nordtnieceanicuranecdeeis fiufficit fecure,pnöfticare.Prcrerea huius V
ftcundi inftrumenti cutatiois fcićtia canto nobis plus neceflaria & vti
lis eft: quanto nos magis etiä fpeculo in morborum cognitionetn duck
8Lyiderefacitintimius. Eaeniquenobisderaorbotu cognitive ezte
rtus appatuerüt in fpeculo-.ülaiam intus vidcre poflumus p clauć apee
cisportispolfuü:&eomagiscumfitpulfusde apparcntibus cum eeri
tudinequeeftfebrisindicanseffenriä eiiis.f.frequenria HC velociras ex
parte fonneiquod non fiat yrina.-qtie cum fit viriabilisiquii yno die
Tnigiscoloraaeitgindiealioidćideonóefaegrinidinis fignu Ipecifi
cumxum nullum fignii fpecificu fit variabile. Vndeffialienus. qm co ‘ -dp P
gnolcitegritudinempvTmäxognoicit fiaiincäperfiaitn.Ergo pnui ' ‘
preceffitcognicio hcus qm hculncc:ergon-ius cognicio eifpefpoitaio
ra.-<Sć perconfequeus nullius egritudiins feu febrS demoii(trat>ua;qui»
vnnanon l>ip>hutmorbos kd n .m nl d ,
ybi pui/usindicatenentiam eius.vt lupra dictum efLquarcaddit Gali
enus icerii dicens.quineßjtdj(Hngucre fpccies egritudinń fimpliciuuj
purarń.-ytpute tebriö mtcrpollacart per pidfum non eil diguus flarę ii
P»
foi LXXXV1
Seconda epiphaniamedicorixm de pulfibus*
modo yna epipha
^■fniarii medicorü illuttrantium fpeculo
videndi yrinas hominii: tanqna
J^jgMjprimo inftrumenro cognitiöis atq; cn
raaó,Y7rborf· efficaaffimo.ÄE
| H nunc de fccutrdaaduc plus ilJuflränte /
' ·';k· 'koki k^nnaniarpuracJaucapcnćdj porks " ' , ' ;
' k." W P'rlimcmi fdentiain morborü co
. » gnitione: yel etiain curarione nobis
yalde necefiaria eft 8C ytilis: yt diat
li^K dc gordoip .* njo
^gjgj^^^^^^^gl'iliarchainedicine exceflcntiifimus.-qd
M^M^^pprobansJąggbus departibus in de
f/d]!^damatioibvß famine brie, fan fcäe
7 prnm vbi d)cit:<j,nqticia pulfuüyal <
-— de neceil»ifift medicomuia nil S1S·'
Fig. 6. Ulrich Pinder, Epiphanie medicorum, 1506, library of Simon Loitz in the
Elbląg Library, photo: Elbląg Library
bookplates, but there are characteristic numbers on the title pages which also
feature on copies with proprietary marks, and furthermore, these titles do not
appear in the inventory, which would support the theory that they belonged
to Heinrich Loitz. In some cases, the signature has been damaged, and this char-
acteristic number is the indication that the work comes from the Loitz collec-
tion. And so, thanks to the comparison with the preserved inventory from 1624,
we could very likely add to the list of works forming part of the legacy works
by Bartholomeus Kechermann, among others. On this basis, we can estimate
288