Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Studio: international art — 23.1901

DOI Heft:
Nr. 101 (August 1901)
DOI Artikel:
Studio-talk
DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.19788#0245

DWork-Logo
Überblick
Faksimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Vollansicht
OCR-Volltext
Studio-Talk

clever Hungarian painters, Akos Tolnai and Committee, astonished his admirers by a beautiful
Francis Innocent. A. T. and broadly-handled study of two horsemen on

the sea-shore. Bocklin is represented by one of his

BERLIN.—The two summer exhibitions last works (unfinished)— Orlando Furioso. Louis
are now open. The distinction between Corinth's Perseus and Andromeda, somewhat
the Secession and the Grosse Berliner suggestive of Bocklin's Drachentodter, reveals
Ausstellung is sharply marked. In colossal technical knowledge, but is somewhat
the one case we find a collection of sane, sound lacking in delicacy.
" documents," all indicating a striving after

new goals; in the other a medley of common, A collection of the works of Vincent van
mediocre productions suited to common and Gogh introduces us to the bizarre champion of
mediocre tastes. The names in the Secession Neo-impressiontsm in Holland. Erich Hancke
speak for themselves—Bocklin, Leibl, Monet, is a talented young "naturalist," who has trans-
Renoir, Israels, Maris, Lavery, Whistler, and ferred his abode from Munich to Berlin. His
Segantini. No suggestion of mediocrity here! Portrait oj a Lady is a fine work, full of
There is scarcely one work among the 351 temperament and sensitiveness. Thomas Theodor
numbered in the catalogue which does not bear Heine shows astonishing delicacy in a little
the stamp of earnest, honest conviction. Max landscape scene, which proves that he is one
Liebermann, the president of the Exhibition of the most gifted members of the young Munich

school. Ludwig von
Hofmann, the charming
Berlin colourist, has of
late been cultivating with
great energy the style of
the Parisian Neo-impres-
sionists. His Mdnade
marks a somewhat uncer-
tain step in this direction.
Leistikow attains once
more the highest heights
in his representation of
Nature, resuming the path
which he had temporarily
abandoned. An admir-
able etching by Kaethe
Kollwitz, full of feeling
and distinction, should
also be mentioned.

The Portrait oj a Lady
by H. E. Linde-Walther
gives proof of the long
and earnest study which
results in good, character-
istic work. Other note-
worthy productions by
young Munich artists are
seen in the exhibits of
Benno Becker, Paul
Crodel, Hubert von
Heyden, Eugen Kirchner,
Christian Landenberger,

portrait my akos tolnai H. R. Lichtenberger,

216
 
Annotationen