Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Studio: international art — 44.1908

DOI issue:
No. 186 (September 1912)
DOI article:
Studio-talk
DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.20778#0324

DWork-Logo
Overview
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
OCR fulltext
Studio- Talk

some interchange of membership has taken
place; and, besides, the aims of both classes
of artists have modified considerably in time,
the one side abating a good deal on their
extreme license, the other gradually giving up
their stern conservatism. There are rooms
and walls in this exhibition which might well
be transplanted to the other side of the house,
and one would not feel in the least that they
were out of place.

As to the contributions from other cities,
our show suffers rather from the circumstance
that so many years have elapsed since its
predecessor occurred. Artists from abroad
have sent a good deal of work which has
already been shown in other towns, and has
consequently figured in the accounts of the
art magazines, but which was thought suitable
for Dresden, as it had not actually been
exhibited here before.

In my humble opinion the Hagenbund

“THE TEACOCKS”

BY AUGUST KUEHLES

of Vienna has sent in the
best among the out-
siders’ exhibits. Its room
is tastefully decorated,
excellently hung, and
there is not a single
picture or piece of sculp-
ture in it which one
would not like to possess.
The Munich Secession
has never been particularly
happy in its contributions
to our Dresden shows, and
this year is no exception
to the rule. But the
Kunstgenossenschaft of
Munich and the “Scholle”
are excellently repre-
sented. There are three
interesting one-man shows
from Munich, Fritz August
Kaulbach, Leo Samberger,
Schramm-Zittau. Karls-
ruhe, Weimar, Stuttgart,
and Diisseldorf show up
well; Konigsberg and
Leipsic do not quite come
up to the mark; Berlin
is, beside the Hagenbund,
3°i

SANKT MARIEN, DANTSIC

BY ARTHUR BENDRAT

(See Berlin Studio- Talk)
 
Annotationen