DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.11260#0134
120 Archdologid! Attics Lib; g: Cap: 3:
in causeg capkall an other proceedingjike to that in theCi-
ty os Venice; white they gave two sentences. In the sirft they
tfContaren: determined whether they ssiould condemne or sree: Isin
Iib'?^P the firft he was condemned;, the manner of puniflbment was
ordained in the fecond.But is in the first thay sound no caufe
os deathjthey bad the accufed to fine himfelfe, which A Xe-
b Apoiog; noshon intimates by ■&svnp%vi & if it were too little thejud-
Socr:p:25$. ges doubdefle made it more, as the S'choliajl of Aristosha"
nes; if I forget not; The cuftome is fetdown by c Cicero^
speaking of Socrates: Ergo Hie qw^ damnatus e!i&c. And he
c De Orat:r. too was condemned; not only by the firft suffrages, but alfo
fbWi.b, by thofe which by the appointment of the Lawes they were
to give the fecond time. For in Athens the accused being
found guilty if the osfence were capitall, they weighed
and coniidered the penalty. When the fentence was to be
given by the Judges they asked the defendant, what he
thought himfelse to have deserved to forfeit, &c.fln the Ve-
netian Common-wealth this is not observcdrJ Intryallif
there be more for the prifoners liberty,then againft him,he is
. fteeight acquitedabut if more then halfe be in the pot of con-
SpiiS demnati0" he Tuffers. a Socrates at the firft had two hundred
eighty and one more againss him, then on his fide;& at the
next eighty more were added to the sorrner,so in all he had
three hundred threefcore and one condemnatory suffrages.
sFag,43ff. But fewer might have done as much. For we read in in eDe»
motfhenes os Cimon like to punnissied with death mi&i ?s£s
/Pag.43o„ f^^m is theree had not been wanting. And againe s <^a(
3 [dvot 4%<p°i •Pitwsyy&v ii (w 5*c«t<» vpZcmtN&y one was suf-
S ag,338* sicient, e Demojihene. Mia, y-Ww dhavcti But Vidian
iAriftoph p on the place a& h*kp)v AiJSvcu TisMeiav, saies that he was
244. lightly punnished. h Is the voices were equall, then was the
prifoner loosedj becaufe fometinies he might be accused up-
on suspitipn; or of those things which he did not willingly
i Probl.sjMH. commit, or perhaps was sued out os envy, and many other
*6« reafons given by » Arisiotk: theresore did the Lawgiver
leave
in causeg capkall an other proceedingjike to that in theCi-
ty os Venice; white they gave two sentences. In the sirft they
tfContaren: determined whether they ssiould condemne or sree: Isin
Iib'?^P the firft he was condemned;, the manner of puniflbment was
ordained in the fecond.But is in the first thay sound no caufe
os deathjthey bad the accufed to fine himfelfe, which A Xe-
b Apoiog; noshon intimates by ■&svnp%vi & if it were too little thejud-
Socr:p:25$. ges doubdefle made it more, as the S'choliajl of Aristosha"
nes; if I forget not; The cuftome is fetdown by c Cicero^
speaking of Socrates: Ergo Hie qw^ damnatus e!i&c. And he
c De Orat:r. too was condemned; not only by the firft suffrages, but alfo
fbWi.b, by thofe which by the appointment of the Lawes they were
to give the fecond time. For in Athens the accused being
found guilty if the osfence were capitall, they weighed
and coniidered the penalty. When the fentence was to be
given by the Judges they asked the defendant, what he
thought himfelse to have deserved to forfeit, &c.fln the Ve-
netian Common-wealth this is not observcdrJ Intryallif
there be more for the prifoners liberty,then againft him,he is
. fteeight acquitedabut if more then halfe be in the pot of con-
SpiiS demnati0" he Tuffers. a Socrates at the firft had two hundred
eighty and one more againss him, then on his fide;& at the
next eighty more were added to the sorrner,so in all he had
three hundred threefcore and one condemnatory suffrages.
sFag,43ff. But fewer might have done as much. For we read in in eDe»
motfhenes os Cimon like to punnissied with death mi&i ?s£s
/Pag.43o„ f^^m is theree had not been wanting. And againe s <^a(
3 [dvot 4%<p°i •Pitwsyy&v ii (w 5*c«t<» vpZcmtN&y one was suf-
S ag,338* sicient, e Demojihene. Mia, y-Ww dhavcti But Vidian
iAriftoph p on the place a& h*kp)v AiJSvcu TisMeiav, saies that he was
244. lightly punnished. h Is the voices were equall, then was the
prifoner loosedj becaufe fometinies he might be accused up-
on suspitipn; or of those things which he did not willingly
i Probl.sjMH. commit, or perhaps was sued out os envy, and many other
*6« reafons given by » Arisiotk: theresore did the Lawgiver
leave