Arch&ologi& Attic a. Lib.} . Cap. p, 221
CAP. I X.
De Libtromm diver [it ate.
foure lortsof Sonnes. 1. 'o yvw&, or iddyum, in
saies * Quintilian, the sonne cither of a forreigne Woman, or 4 3.C. 6.
a Concubine; such a sonne, if his Father were but a private
man, might have nothing to doe with the name, or the kin*
dred of his Father, csia tj nJ vQ$ayM'$e?yji<?Http saies *s4rn
stophanes-* and if the case were thus when the ^Mother was * j„ 4^
a slranger, how just a caule had Ion in the Poet, to complaine Eurip. v. jpi,"
as he did?
na^os t' 6mura, cuj nt £v voSnyafa
Bat if the fathcrwere a Prince, or some great Potentate (is
we may believe Eustathius upon b How??- concerning 7«wr h\l. 8.
who was atfoz/wbimielfej being We// borne he must needs be
lawsully borne, and /o he was heldinasgreatesteemeasany
other, and en joyd his inheritance: covfuetudims Reguzfuit ut
legitimom Uxor em non habentes alicjwm licet captivam t&mtn
pre legitime haberem, m Uberi ex ipsa rati [uccederent,hits Ser-
•vius. Whereas the other must be pop'd along with a portion
orjyorathousand^c/jw.sactheroosi: * this portion they* Hirpcc
called 7«»'o5hrf, which they had in the nature of gifts, like
njn.S which f Abraham gave to the sonnes of his concubines: ^ {
it was the value o{mmi**2r of five minis saies the Scholiast en-2S- • •
upon Aristephanes in Avibm. where I remember how Hercn*
Its Qupiters bastard by ts4hma*a the Wife of tssmphjtricn)
when Pistbetercshid told him, that being »«3oV, by the Law he
could not lay claime to the least part of bis sathers estate,
makes answer thus;
Ee 3
CAP. I X.
De Libtromm diver [it ate.
foure lortsof Sonnes. 1. 'o yvw&, or iddyum, in
saies * Quintilian, the sonne cither of a forreigne Woman, or 4 3.C. 6.
a Concubine; such a sonne, if his Father were but a private
man, might have nothing to doe with the name, or the kin*
dred of his Father, csia tj nJ vQ$ayM'$e?yji<?Http saies *s4rn
stophanes-* and if the case were thus when the ^Mother was * j„ 4^
a slranger, how just a caule had Ion in the Poet, to complaine Eurip. v. jpi,"
as he did?
na^os t' 6mura, cuj nt £v voSnyafa
Bat if the fathcrwere a Prince, or some great Potentate (is
we may believe Eustathius upon b How??- concerning 7«wr h\l. 8.
who was atfoz/wbimielfej being We// borne he must needs be
lawsully borne, and /o he was heldinasgreatesteemeasany
other, and en joyd his inheritance: covfuetudims Reguzfuit ut
legitimom Uxor em non habentes alicjwm licet captivam t&mtn
pre legitime haberem, m Uberi ex ipsa rati [uccederent,hits Ser-
•vius. Whereas the other must be pop'd along with a portion
orjyorathousand^c/jw.sactheroosi: * this portion they* Hirpcc
called 7«»'o5hrf, which they had in the nature of gifts, like
njn.S which f Abraham gave to the sonnes of his concubines: ^ {
it was the value o{mmi**2r of five minis saies the Scholiast en-2S- • •
upon Aristephanes in Avibm. where I remember how Hercn*
Its Qupiters bastard by ts4hma*a the Wife of tssmphjtricn)
when Pistbetercshid told him, that being »«3oV, by the Law he
could not lay claime to the least part of bis sathers estate,
makes answer thus;
Ee 3