DOI Heft:
No. 79 (October, 1899)
DOI Artikel:Studio-talk
DOI Seite / Zitierlink: https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.19783#0076
Studio- Talk
display, and, if this be the
fact, the project is to be
cordially commended.
Bh ■•-/.,. j
The medals for the Ex-
hibition of 1900 have been
entrusted by the Govern-
ment to MM. Chaplain and
Roty, and no one who is
acquainted with the work
of these two artists will be
disposed to complain. At
the same time one cannot
fail to notice the bias
shown by the Societe des
Beaux-Arts in systemati-
cally ignoring the new
DECORATIVE PANEL AT THE PRINCES RESTAURANT BY H. C. BREWER 0
school of French sculpture,
which has demonstrated its
just resolved themselves into a syndicate. The abilities for years past. Unfortunately—or shall one
president is M. J. Comte, the vice-presidents are say fortunately ?—for the members of this school,
MM. G. Geoffroy and de Fourcaud, the secretaries MM. Rodin, Alexandre Charpentier, Camille
MM. Ange de Lassus and de Saint-Mesniere, the Lefevre, and Mile. Claudel are not, and doubtless
treasurer is M. E. Benoit-Levy, and the members never will be, attached to the Institute. Thus it is
are MM. L. Benedite, Champier, Dalligny, C. they have no share in the work for which their
Fromentin, P. Gille, M. Hamel, F. Jourdain, G. talents obviously designate them; nor have they
Larroumet, G. Lecomtc, L. Maillard, R. Marx, G. any voice in the distribution of the commissions
Mourey, H. Nocq, C. Normand, and G. Streglcr. for the Exhibition, either as regards the Palais des
Apart from its professional work, the " Syndicat de Champs-Elysees or the Pont Alexandre III. Every-
la Presse':'Artistique" intends, it would seem, to thing has been placed in the hands of Prix de
organise exhibitions. There is talk of a Watteau Rome winners or members of the Institute. What
display, and, if this be the
fact, the project is to be
cordially commended.
Bh ■•-/.,. j
The medals for the Ex-
hibition of 1900 have been
entrusted by the Govern-
ment to MM. Chaplain and
Roty, and no one who is
acquainted with the work
of these two artists will be
disposed to complain. At
the same time one cannot
fail to notice the bias
shown by the Societe des
Beaux-Arts in systemati-
cally ignoring the new
DECORATIVE PANEL AT THE PRINCES RESTAURANT BY H. C. BREWER 0
school of French sculpture,
which has demonstrated its
just resolved themselves into a syndicate. The abilities for years past. Unfortunately—or shall one
president is M. J. Comte, the vice-presidents are say fortunately ?—for the members of this school,
MM. G. Geoffroy and de Fourcaud, the secretaries MM. Rodin, Alexandre Charpentier, Camille
MM. Ange de Lassus and de Saint-Mesniere, the Lefevre, and Mile. Claudel are not, and doubtless
treasurer is M. E. Benoit-Levy, and the members never will be, attached to the Institute. Thus it is
are MM. L. Benedite, Champier, Dalligny, C. they have no share in the work for which their
Fromentin, P. Gille, M. Hamel, F. Jourdain, G. talents obviously designate them; nor have they
Larroumet, G. Lecomtc, L. Maillard, R. Marx, G. any voice in the distribution of the commissions
Mourey, H. Nocq, C. Normand, and G. Streglcr. for the Exhibition, either as regards the Palais des
Apart from its professional work, the " Syndicat de Champs-Elysees or the Pont Alexandre III. Every-
la Presse':'Artistique" intends, it would seem, to thing has been placed in the hands of Prix de
organise exhibitions. There is talk of a Watteau Rome winners or members of the Institute. What