DOI Heft:
Heft 3
DOI Artikel:Dragumēs, Stephanos N.: Oi en Mykēnais Thēsauroi, [2]
DOI Artikel:Ramsay, William Mitchell: Correction
DOI Seite / Zitierlink: https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.38033#0388
W. M. RAMSAY, COItftECTlON
sn
ιδιαιτέρων Iv τοΐς ναοΐς θησαυρών λεγάμενα. Νεοφανής δλως θησαυρός
έν θεάτρω αναγράφεται έν τη ύπό Τ. Homolle δημοσιευθείσγ ( Bull.
Corr. Hell. XVIII, ρ. 163) δηλιααη επιγραφή.
ΠΑΡΟΡΑΜΑ. Εν σ. 148, στίχω 32. αντί προσόμοιον γράφε
προσομοίαν.
Σ. Ν. Δ.
CORRECTION
In his interesting and valuable paper on Dorylaion, Dr Pre-
ger speaks of die Ansicht Kiepert’s und Ramsay's, welche
Dorylaion genau an der Stelle der heutigen hügellosen
Stadt suchen [Athen. Mitth. XIX p. 303); and he pla-
ces the site of the Roman city on the mound called Shar-öyük
north of the river Tembris. Dr Preger has been misled as to
my opinion, through no fault of his, but through my loose
expression. I hold the same opinion as he holds about Ro-
man Dorylaion. In Journal of Hellenic Studies VIII, 1887,
p. 503, I say ‘the Roman city stood round the mound now
called Sheher Eyuk, two miles north of Eski Sheher’; and in
my Historieal geography of Asia Minor p. 86, in tracing
the change of site to which ancient cities were exposed, I say
‘ the Roman Dorylaion was situated at Shahr Eyuk, a little
to the north of Eski Sheher in the plain’, and explain this
Position as due to a Pergamenian foundation. But, as I think
that the hot springs and the general advantages of the site at
Eski Sheher (where pre-Roman Dorylaion stood), must al-
ways have kept it in existence even through the Roman pe-
riod, 1 have in general spoken loosely of Eski Sheher as the
site of Dorylaion (an instance of which occurs in the page
just quoted from Journ. Hell. StucL).
W. M. RAMSAY.
sn
ιδιαιτέρων Iv τοΐς ναοΐς θησαυρών λεγάμενα. Νεοφανής δλως θησαυρός
έν θεάτρω αναγράφεται έν τη ύπό Τ. Homolle δημοσιευθείσγ ( Bull.
Corr. Hell. XVIII, ρ. 163) δηλιααη επιγραφή.
ΠΑΡΟΡΑΜΑ. Εν σ. 148, στίχω 32. αντί προσόμοιον γράφε
προσομοίαν.
Σ. Ν. Δ.
CORRECTION
In his interesting and valuable paper on Dorylaion, Dr Pre-
ger speaks of die Ansicht Kiepert’s und Ramsay's, welche
Dorylaion genau an der Stelle der heutigen hügellosen
Stadt suchen [Athen. Mitth. XIX p. 303); and he pla-
ces the site of the Roman city on the mound called Shar-öyük
north of the river Tembris. Dr Preger has been misled as to
my opinion, through no fault of his, but through my loose
expression. I hold the same opinion as he holds about Ro-
man Dorylaion. In Journal of Hellenic Studies VIII, 1887,
p. 503, I say ‘the Roman city stood round the mound now
called Sheher Eyuk, two miles north of Eski Sheher’; and in
my Historieal geography of Asia Minor p. 86, in tracing
the change of site to which ancient cities were exposed, I say
‘ the Roman Dorylaion was situated at Shahr Eyuk, a little
to the north of Eski Sheher in the plain’, and explain this
Position as due to a Pergamenian foundation. But, as I think
that the hot springs and the general advantages of the site at
Eski Sheher (where pre-Roman Dorylaion stood), must al-
ways have kept it in existence even through the Roman pe-
riod, 1 have in general spoken loosely of Eski Sheher as the
site of Dorylaion (an instance of which occurs in the page
just quoted from Journ. Hell. StucL).
W. M. RAMSAY.