Hinweis: Dies ist eine zusätzlich gescannte Seite, um Farbkeil und Maßstab abbilden zu können.
0.5
1 cm
398
Katarztna Szelągowska-Kunstmam, Marek Szymoński, Franciszek Krok. ..
I» SHg
P (0
Ł SZ
§_°? o
- c
P o
I- o
— CD
I o
=_in
I 0
P 0Ô
I- O
I-" o
I o
= E
— o
(K 766.49 nmft l(Si 634.71 nm) (LIBS) versus concentra-
ium in wt.% (SEM/EDX).
ts of potassium content are shown. Intensity of the
i with respect to the intensity ofsiiicon line 634.71
;nt obtained with SEM/DEX. Contrary to sodium,
imilarity for the modern glass samples (although
;s). Rather large differences between historic glass
|6 are fairly similar. Those discrepancies are due to
among the historical glasses, as mentioned above.
Conclusions
sis of different glass samples (historic and modern)
and SEM/EDX techniques. From results obtained
ely, in the modern glass group, being soda-lime-
of the 3 rd sample may suggest that this particular
others (for instance imported from outside of the
îe historic glass group, being potash-lime-silicate
imilarities. This similarity is a particularly interes-
no. 6 is from 16 th c., while sarnples no. 4 and 5 are
ty suggest that samples 4 and 5 couid be older than
/ever, needs to be confmned 'by further investiga-
s sample no. 8, of unknown origin, belongs to the
iie). It means that this glass (and at least parts ofthe
tple was collected) has characteristic properties of
Katarztna Szelągowska-Kunstmam, Marek Szymoński, Franciszek Krok. ..
I» SHg
P (0
Ł SZ
§_°? o
- c
P o
I- o
— CD
I o
=_in
I 0
P 0Ô
I- O
I-" o
I o
= E
— o
(K 766.49 nmft l(Si 634.71 nm) (LIBS) versus concentra-
ium in wt.% (SEM/EDX).
ts of potassium content are shown. Intensity of the
i with respect to the intensity ofsiiicon line 634.71
;nt obtained with SEM/DEX. Contrary to sodium,
imilarity for the modern glass samples (although
;s). Rather large differences between historic glass
|6 are fairly similar. Those discrepancies are due to
among the historical glasses, as mentioned above.
Conclusions
sis of different glass samples (historic and modern)
and SEM/EDX techniques. From results obtained
ely, in the modern glass group, being soda-lime-
of the 3 rd sample may suggest that this particular
others (for instance imported from outside of the
îe historic glass group, being potash-lime-silicate
imilarities. This similarity is a particularly interes-
no. 6 is from 16 th c., while sarnples no. 4 and 5 are
ty suggest that samples 4 and 5 couid be older than
/ever, needs to be confmned 'by further investiga-
s sample no. 8, of unknown origin, belongs to the
iie). It means that this glass (and at least parts ofthe
tple was collected) has characteristic properties of